Practice
Relevant professional or facilitation expertise.
Get involved / Collaborate
Practitioners, researchers and aligned initiatives can explore joint work where each party’s contribution, standards and decision responsibilities are understood from the beginning.

Complementary expertise
A collaboration is strongest when each party can name what they contribute, what sits outside their remit and why joint work benefits the people at the centre.
Relevant professional or facilitation expertise.
Context, relationships or access held responsibly.
Research, learning or evaluation capability.
Compatible ethics, safeguarding and attribution.

Research and ethics
Research or evidence activity should define consent, information handling, participation, dissemination and the limits of any public claim.
Shared activity proceeds only where purpose, responsibility and likely benefit are clear enough to justify the work.
Working agreement
Name the expertise, time, materials and authority each party brings.
Agree who decides on scope, safeguarding, communications and change.
Set accurate credit, review and publication expectations before public use.
Engagement pathway
Describe the gap, audience, intended benefit and why joint work may help.
Clarify complementary expertise, capacity, constraints and standards.
Agree a practical first piece of work before considering expansion.
Set responsibilities, decision rights, safeguarding and communications.
Review evidence and fit before continuing, adapting or closing.

Joint reflection
A review considers whether the collaboration remains useful, ethical and adequately resourced.
Where fit has changed, the work can conclude with responsibilities, information and public communications handled appropriately.
Prepare an enquiry
Do not include confidential client, health or safeguarding information in an initial enquiry.